• About
    • Info & Team
    • Support
    • Storefront
  • Work
    • Undergraduate Work
    • Graduate Work
    • Alumni Work
    • Faculty Work
    • Co-op
  • Community
    • Exhibition
    • Event
    • Initiatives
  • Articles
bridge@waterlooarchitecture.com
BridgeBridge
  • About
    • Info & Team
    • Support
    • Storefront
  • Work
    • Undergraduate Work
    • Graduate Work
    • Alumni Work
    • Faculty Work
    • Co-op
  • Community
    • Exhibition
    • Event
    • Initiatives
  • Articles

THESIS: Synanthropic Suburbia

September 1, 2015 Posted by BRIDGE Community, Event, Graduate Work, Work

Synanthropic Suburbia: Design Experiments in the Suburban Biome

Abstract by Sarah Gunawan

Animals are invading the city. Coyotes are sighted on downtown streets with greater frequency, raccoons notoriously forage through greenbins as their primary source of food, and all forms of animals inhabit the surfaces, edges and cavities of the built environment. Once wild animals are now adapting to the urban ecosystem and a new human animal relationship is emerging. Between the domestic and the wild are the synanthropic species, defined as animals who benefit from living in close proximity to humans yet, remain beyond their control. Since these animals are neither beloved pets, nor wild beasts, synanthropes are often deemed pests. However, they are the urban mediate, capable of living alongside the pervasive human population by adapting to anthropogenic behaviours and environments. As the conceptual division between city and nature dissolves, architecture is called upon to negotiate the physical boundary between human and synanthropic animal. Synanthropic Suburbia therefore reimagines human animal interactions, using architecture to structure hybrid relationships that positively contribute to the urban ecosystem.

SG_interactions

The thesis is positioned within a landscape of rapid ecological transformation – the suburbs – and engages the space of greatest tension between human and animal – the domestic territory of the house. The objective is to explore the potential for architecture to incorporate habitat support into architectural form and landscape systems. The research and design methodology investigates the interrelationship between scales of design and ecological impact. How can the multiplication of small scale, architectural interventions influence large scale territorial systems and patterns?  Synanthropic Suburbia seeks to answer this question through a series of telescoping design experiments that position six animal species as active players by engaging their habitat requirements, biological behaviours, and seasonal patterns. Three architectural prosthetics re-imagine conventional building components into hybrid systems that augment the single family home and define the physical interface between human and non-human species.

SG_raccoonSG_chimneySG_barnowlSG_dormer

 

The multiplication of the prosthetic systems engages the broader biological requirements of a species and integrates the spatial development patters to define new synanthropic suburban typologies. These syn-urban building blocks are then proliferated across the territorial scale to create a robust, novel ecosystem that is capable of supporting a diversity and density of human and non-human species. The design process seeks to unpack the interconnectivity between complex socio-ecological systems through the multi-scale design of the suburban biome.

In the current context of global urbanization and socio-ecological change, Synanthropic Suburbia takes the opportunity to restructure human biological and cultural relationships with non-human species. Animals are now equal citizens with the agency to contribute to the dynamic processes of production, consumption and inhabitation of the syn-urban biome. Synanthropic architecture blurs the spatial definition between human and non-human to maximize the mutual benefits of cohabitation. Eventually human perceptions could shift and more hybrid conditions of human-animal living could emerge, yet, one question will always remain, how close is too close?

The examining committee is as follows:
Supervisor: Lola Sheppard, University of Waterloo
Committee Members: Matthew Spremulli, University of Waterloo
Robert Corry, University of Guelph
External Reader: Joyce Hwang, University at Buffalo

The Defence Examination will take place on Thursday September 10, 2o15 at 2:00 PM in ARC Loft.

 

SG_assemble2

SG_assemble3

SG_assemble4

SG_perspective

SG_erritory

 

 

BRIDGE
+ postsBio
  • BRIDGE
    https://waterlooarchitecture.com/bridge/blog/author/bridge/
    MISSING PAGES is now live!
  • BRIDGE
    https://waterlooarchitecture.com/bridge/blog/author/bridge/
    CALL FOR SUBMISSION / Missing Pages: An Alternative Archive
  • BRIDGE
    https://waterlooarchitecture.com/bridge/blog/author/bridge/
    CALL FOR PROPOSALS/APPEL À PROJETS: Missing Pages
  • BRIDGE
    https://waterlooarchitecture.com/bridge/blog/author/bridge/
    LAND MARKS
Tags: animalprostheticsSarah Gunawansuburbsthesis

About BRIDGE

This author hasn't written their bio yet.
BRIDGE has contributed 98 entries to our website, so far.View entries by BRIDGE

You also might be interested in

THESIS: Algae Textile

THESIS: Algae Textile

Sep 6, 2014

Abstract by Petra Bogias By innovating the photobioreactor, the growth[...]

The Mountain and the Valley

The Mountain and the Valley

Aug 7, 2014

ABSTRACT by Caitlin Perry The Annapolis Valley Region is home[...]

Reflecting on Empathy: Thesis Without Fear (Part 1)

Reflecting on Empathy: Thesis Without Fear (Part 1)

Sep 5, 2016

"You can do damn near anything; you just have to understand how to make a book out of it." - Donald McKay

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search

BRIDGE

Center for Architecture + Design

7 Melville St. S, Cambridge, ON

  • bridge@waterlooarchitecture.com

© 2025 — BRIDGE.